What is the best method for placing generic air terminals in an architectural model using the location of existing MEP air terminals?

Using Copy/Monitor with type mapping is the most effective method for placing generic air terminals in an architectural model based on existing MEP air terminals. This approach allows architectural professionals to not only duplicate the air terminals accurately but also ensure that they are correctly mapped to appropriate types in the project. Type mapping simplifies the process of adjusting the properties of the copied elements, ensuring that, while duplicating the terminals, they maintain consistency and adhere to design standards.

Type mapping is particularly important in a coordinated environment, as it allows for modifications to be applied seamlessly if the MEP team updates the original terminals. Additionally, this method reduces the potential for errors by ensuring that each terminal is linked to a corresponding family type, thus streamlining the workflow and promoting accuracy in the project.

In contrast, other methods have significant drawbacks. Batch copying using Copy/Monitor may not offer the same level of specificity, as it typically doesn't accommodate nuanced adjustments for different air terminal types. Placing each terminal individually would be time-consuming and less efficient, missing the opportunity to leverage the existing layout. Copying to the clipboard and pasting into the model lacks the coordination features provided by Copy/Monitor, which is vital for maintaining a well-integrated building information model (BIM).